Past review · · Go to the latest review

← Back to overview

Sources

Every finding links to an original publication. Older material remains available even when the latest review no longer uses it.

38 checked accounts

Swift used onboard sensing and computation to race autonomously.UZH / Nature · Aug 30, 2023

The source reports a test or observation

Champion-level drone racing using deep reinforcement learning ↗

We read the full text

only onboard sensors and computation

Original wording · Where to find it: p. 982, introduction

Where this applies

A trained racing course; navigation decisions only.

Another way to read this result

Task autonomy does not establish unrestricted mission autonomy.

About this source
System
Swift
Version
Nature 2023
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Aug 30, 2023
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
Swift recorded the fastest race time in the reported contest.UZH / Nature · Aug 30, 2023

The source reports a test or observation

Champion-level drone racing using deep reinforcement learning ↗

We read the full text

fastest race time

Original wording · Where to find it: p. 983, Results; Fig. 3

Where this applies

A specific course and trained competitors.

Another way to read this result

Racing performance does not establish a defense response window.

About this source
System
Swift
Version
Nature 2023
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Aug 30, 2023
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
The paper identifies changed appearance as a failure risk for Swift.UZH / Nature · Aug 30, 2023

The source reports a test or observation

Champion-level drone racing using deep reinforcement learning ↗

We read the full text

system can fail

Original wording · Where to find it: p. 985, Discussion, appearance changes

Where this applies

The 2023 policy and training environment.

Another way to read this result

A limitation of this version, not proof that adaptation is impossible.

About this source
System
Swift
Version
Nature 2023
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Aug 30, 2023
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
Swift was not trained to recover after a crash.UZH / Nature · Aug 30, 2023

The source reports a test or observation

Champion-level drone racing using deep reinforcement learning ↗

We read the full text

not trained to recover after a crash

Original wording · Where to find it: p. 985, Discussion

Where this applies

The tested racing system.

Another way to read this result

This does not assess a later version or every fault type.

About this source
System
Swift
Version
Nature 2023
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Aug 30, 2023
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
The ZJU research platform integrates onboard perception, localization and control.ZJU / Science Robotics · May 2022

The source reports a test or observation

Swarm of micro flying robots in the wild ↗

We read the abstract; full test details still need checking

onboard perception, localization, and control

Original wording · Where to find it: Abstract, platform integration sentence

Where this applies

Research field trials; inspected author-hosted abstract.

Another way to read this result

The accessible abstract limits verification of detailed conditions.

About this source
System
ZJU micro-drone swarm
Version
Science Robotics 2022
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
May 2022
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
The paper reports field demonstrations of coordinated swarm navigation.ZJU / Science Robotics · May 2022

The source reports a test or observation

Swarm of micro flying robots in the wild ↗

We read the abstract; full test details still need checking

coordination as a swarm without external facilities

Original wording · Where to find it: Abstract, final sentence

Where this applies

The same 2022 research platform; external facilities not required.

Another way to read this result

This does not demonstrate loss replacement or radio silence.

About this source
System
ZJU micro-drone swarm
Version
Science Robotics 2022
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
May 2022
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
DARPA states that FLA systems do not require a communications link.DARPA · Jul 18, 2018

The statement is verified; the capability is not

Faster, Lighter, Smarter: DARPA Gives Small Autonomous Systems a Tech Boost ↗

We read the full text

no communications link

Original wording · Where to find it: Program manager quotation, paragraph 6

Where this applies

Program-level statement; exact vehicle version and link-loss logs unavailable.

Another way to read this result

Link independence is asserted; not every test’s link state is disclosed.

About this source
Reviews that used this account
The later FLA evaluation reports limited round-trip success in its hardest Phase 1 test.UMass Lowell / arXiv · Apr 10, 2025

The source reports a test or observation

Threading the Needle: Test and Evaluation of Early Stage UAS Capabilities to Autonomously Navigate GPS-Denied Environments in the DARPA Fast Lightweight Autonomy (FLA) Program ↗

We read the full text

only 8% (23/303) successfully returned to start

Original wording · Where to find it: IV-C, last paragraph

Where this applies

2017 trials, reported in 2025; anonymized teams, not Phase 2.

Another way to read this result

Earlier failures do not disprove later improvements.

About this source
System
DARPA FLA
Version
Phase 1 / experiment 4
Event
May 2017
Published
Apr 10, 2025
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

Reviews that used this account
DARPA reports collaborative operations using both OFFSET testbeds.DARPA · Dec 9, 2021

The statement is verified; the capability is not

OFFSET Swarms Take Flight in Final Field Experiment ↗

We read the full text

Combined collaborative operations

Original wording · Where to find it: FX-6 advancements, first bullet

Where this applies

Mixed air and ground platforms; virtual agents also present.

Another way to read this result

The headline platform total is not a count of autonomous aircraft in flight.

About this source
System
DARPA OFFSET
Version
FX-6
Event
Nov 2021
Published
Dec 9, 2021
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

Reviews that used this account
CCAST researchers report congestion that blocked completion of assigned tasks.Brown & Adams / Field Robotics · Jul 31, 2023

The source reports a test or observation

Congestion Analysis for the DARPA OFFSET CCAST Swarm ↗

We read the abstract; full test details still need checking

congestion that blocked vehicles from completing tactic assignments

Original wording · Where to find it: Abstract, second paragraph

Where this applies

A particular mixed-robot exercise; abstract inspected.

Another way to read this result

An integration limit, not evidence that large fleets are impossible.

About this source
System
DARPA OFFSET CCAST
Version
FX-6
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Jul 31, 2023
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

Reviews that used this account
The Army reports a 64-day Zephyr 8 flight demonstration.U.S. Army APNT/Space CFT · Aug 22, 2022

The source reports a test or observation

APNT/Space CFT concludes high altitude experimentation ↗

We read the full text through a reading service

64-day stratospheric flight demonstration

Original wording · Where to find it: Opening paragraph

Where this applies

Solar high-altitude prototype; not a small low-altitude drone.

Another way to read this result

Long endurance does not establish repeatable successful missions.

About this source
System
Zephyr 8
Version
Not disclosed / unknown
Event
Jun 15, 2022 – Aug 18, 2022
Published
Aug 22, 2022
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
That Zephyr 8 campaign ended unexpectedly.U.S. Army APNT/Space CFT · Aug 22, 2022

The source reports a test or observation

APNT/Space CFT concludes high altitude experimentation ↗

We read the full text through a reading service

unexpected termination

Original wording · Where to find it: Paragraph 3

Where this applies

The same 2022 flight as C011.

Another way to read this result

The ending limits reliability claims but does not erase achieved endurance.

About this source
System
Zephyr 8
Version
Not disclosed / unknown
Event
Aug 18, 2022
Published
Aug 22, 2022
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
ATSB found that unstable conditions exceeded this aircraft’s controlled-flight capability.Australian Transport Safety Bureau · Sep 28, 2020

The source reports a test or observation

In-flight break-up involving Airbus Zephyr unmanned aerial vehicle, near Wyndham Airport, Western Australia, on 28 September 2019 ↗

We read the full text

beyond the aircraft’s ability to remain in controlled flight

Original wording · Where to find it: Safety summary, What the ATSB found

Where this applies

A 2019 accident, different from the 2022 and 2025 flights.

Another way to read this result

Do not transfer an older airframe’s failure to every later version.

About this source
System
Zephyr 8
Version
Z8B-03
Event
Sep 28, 2019
Published
Sep 28, 2020
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
Experiments demonstrate position control after one rotor fails.Sun et al. / IEEE RA-L · Feb 26, 2021

Only part of the finding is supported

Autonomous Quadrotor Flight despite Rotor Failure with Onboard Vision Sensors: Frames vs. Events ↗

We read the abstract; full test details still need checking

achieve position control of a quadrotor subjected to complete failure of one rotor

Original wording · Where to find it: Abstract, method and experimental-validation sentences

Where this applies

Laboratory flight-control task; inspected abstract.

Another way to read this result

Maintaining position is weaker than completing a continuing mission.

About this source
System
UZH / TU Delft quadrotor
Version
Not disclosed / unknown
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Feb 26, 2021
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
Skydio documents the Cayley release with new tracking and mission-planning features.Skydio · Mar 11, 2026

Document checked

Skydio X10: Cayley v43.147 - 11 March 2026 ↗

We read the full text

Skydio X10 drone version | Cayley (43.147.55)

Original wording · Where to find it: Release table; New capabilities

Where this applies

Manufacturer release artifact; staged rollout.

Another way to read this result

Documents a release, not independent validation of feature performance.

About this source
System
Skydio X10
Version
43.147.55
Event
Mar 11, 2026
Published
Mar 11, 2026
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

Reviews that used this account
Skydio documents a later Draper release with mission-resume changes.Skydio · Jun 23, 2026

Document checked

Skydio X10: Draper v46.122.39 - 16 July 2026 ↗

We read the full text

July 16, 2026

Original wording · Where to find it: Release table; Highlights

Where this applies

The X10 software lineage, not X10D equivalence.

Another way to read this result

A lifecycle record does not establish battlefield adaptation.

About this source
System
Skydio X10
Version
46.122.39
Event
Jul 16, 2026
Published
Jun 23, 2026
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

Reviews that used this account
A third dated X10 release provides fixes through a limited rollout.Skydio · Sep 8, 2026

Document checked

Skydio X10: Draper Point Release 2 v46.122.103 - 10 September 2026 ↗

We read the full text

two bug fixes and no feature changes

Original wording · Where to find it: Release table; note and Fixes

Where this applies

Only selected devices/customers at this release date.

Another way to read this result

More releases do not imply uniformly greater capability or fleet adoption.

About this source
System
Skydio X10
Version
46.122.103
Event
Sep 10, 2026
Published
Sep 8, 2026
Checked
Oct 19, 2026

Related reports

Reviews that used this account
Shield AI announced a future demonstration of coordinated LUCAS systems.Shield AI · May 19, 2026

The statement is verified; the capability is not

Shield AI selected to bring AI-powered swarming to LUCAS kamikaze drone program ↗

We read the full text

will include an operational demonstration this fall

Original wording · Where to find it: Paragraph 3

Where this applies

May announcement; completion not verified in this baseline.

Another way to read this result

A planned demonstration cannot establish an integrated capability today.

About this source
System
LUCAS / Hivemind
Version
Not disclosed / unknown
Event
May 19, 2026
Published
May 19, 2026
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
Field measurements detected and tracked a small Phantom 4.Yang et al. / IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation · Apr 26, 2021

The source reports a test or observation

Practical investigation of a MIMO radar system capabilities for small drones detection ↗

We read the abstract; full test details still need checking

detection and tracking of a small DJI-Phantom 4 drone

Original wording · Where to find it: Abstract, measurement-campaign sentence

Where this applies

A particular radar test; abstract inspected.

Another way to read this result

Small size alone cannot establish low observability across sensors.

About this source
System
DJI Phantom 4
Version
Not disclosed / unknown
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Apr 26, 2021
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
Ukraine’s ministry reports a broad AI-drone production ecosystem.Міністерство оборони України · Apr 18, 2026

The statement is verified; the capability is not

ШІ на війні проти рф: як Україна будує керовану даними армію ↗

We read the full text

Понад 200 компаній задіяно у виробництві дронів із ШІ

Original wording · Where to find it: Opening body paragraph

Where this applies

Sector-wide statement; no platform-specific loss-replacement series.

Another way to read this result

Company counts are not delivered units or replenishment rates.

About this source
System
Ukraine AI-drone sector
Version
Not disclosed / unknown
Event
Apr 18, 2026
Published
Apr 18, 2026
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
A 2026 preprint reports generalization to new racetracks without test-time adaptation.Green et al. / arXiv · Jun 25, 2026

Only part of the finding is supported

Bridging Performance and Generalization in Reinforcement Learning for Agile Flight ↗

We read the abstract; full test details still need checking

without test-time adaptation

Original wording · Where to find it: Abstract, proposed framework

Where this applies

Research racing tasks; abstract only, no defense-change test.

Another way to read this result

Generalization and adaptation to a changed defense are distinct.

About this source
System
UZH generalist racing policy
Version
arXiv:2606.27348v1
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Jun 25, 2026
Checked
Oct 4, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
AALTO reports a longer Zephyr flight in 2025.AALTO · May 1, 2025

The statement is verified; the capability is not

Zephyr sets world-record for longest continuous flight, flying 67 days in stratosphere ↗

We read the full text

67 days, 6 hours and 52 minutes

Original wording · Where to find it: Opening body paragraph

Where this applies

Manufacturer account; exact configuration not disclosed.

Another way to read this result

This statement is not independent replication of the 2022 test.

About this source
System
Zephyr
Version
Not disclosed / unknown
Event
Apr 28, 2025
Published
May 1, 2025
Checked
Oct 12, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
FlockDiffusion reports simulated coordination of ten drones.Zhura et al. / arXiv · Sep 20, 2026

Document checked

FlockDiffusion: Assignment-Conditioned Diffusion for Multi-Drone Task Allocation and Completion ↗

We read the abstract and the relevant methods, results and conclusions

These simulations demonstrate efficient coordination of 10 drones

Original wording · Where to find it: Section V, final paragraph; IV-C and IV-E

Where this applies

PyBullet and Gazebo evaluations; no physical fleet result here.

Another way to read this result

Simulation progress does not establish physical coordination.

About this source
System
FlockDiffusion
Version
arXiv:2609.23745v1
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Sep 20, 2026
Checked
Oct 5, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
The rotor-failure study validates path-following in simulation.Al Lawati & Akhtar / arXiv · Sep 20, 2026

Document checked

Quasi-Static Fault-Tolerant Feedback Control of a Quadrotor under Rotor Failure with Provable Safety Guarantees ↗

We read the abstract and the relevant methods, results and conclusions

validated via the Drake physics engine

Original wording · Where to find it: Section VII, final sentence; Section VI

Where this applies

Drake numerical experiment; no physical flight reported.

Another way to read this result

It does not establish real mission completion after a fault.

About this source
System
QSF simulated quadrotor
Version
arXiv:2609.23918v1
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Sep 20, 2026
Checked
Oct 5, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
A Crazyflie study reports 27 completed physical races.Sanchez Roncero et al. / arXiv · Sep 29, 2026

The source reports a test or observation

Battery-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Aggressive Quadrotor Flight ↗

We read the abstract and the relevant methods, results and conclusions

All 27 evaluated races complete the requested laps without failures or crashes.

Original wording · Where to find it: Section IV-C, Gate racing, opening paragraph

Where this applies

Laboratory course with motion capture; preprint, no independent replication.

Another way to read this result

This neither replicates Swift nor measures defense response time.

About this source
System
Crazyflie Brushless
Version
arXiv:2609.37316v1
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Sep 29, 2026
Checked
Oct 5, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
Shield AI reports a coordinated search by three Mighty Hornet III aircraft.Shield AI · Aug 5, 2026

The statement is verified; the capability is not

Shield AI and Taiwan’s NCSIST complete autonomous swarm exercise and expand sovereign AI and Autonomy efforts ↗

We read the full text

coordinated autonomous search mission with three NCSIST Mighty Hornet III unmanned aerial vehicles

Original wording · Where to find it: Opening paragraph; following paragraph states inter-agent communications

Where this applies

Vendor account; version and event date absent. Page: 5 August; dateline: 6 August.

Another way to read this result

Inter-agent communication is stated; loss of operator link is not tested here.

About this source
System
NCSIST Mighty Hornet III / Hivemind
Version
Not disclosed / unknown
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Aug 5, 2026
Checked
Oct 5, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
Dstl reports eight weeks of trials with an eight-aircraft swarm testbed.Defence Science and Technology Laboratory · Sep 16, 2026

The statement is verified; the capability is not

Dstl drone swarm accelerates Army autonomy ambition ↗

We read the full text

completed 8 weeks of experimentation with the Swarm CTB (Capability Test Bed), consisting of 8 uncrewed aerial vehicles

Original wording · Where to find it: Body paragraph beginning “The Army has already completed”; preceding description of two industry-led options

Where this applies

Official summary; two industry options, no detailed protocol or software versions.

Another way to read this result

This is not independent repetition of the ZJU platform or evidence of loss replacement.

About this source
System
Dstl Swarm Capability Test Bed
Version
Software Defined Swarms Phase 1
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Sep 16, 2026
Checked
Oct 5, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
A physical research quadrotor navigated waypoints with one propeller removed.Zhou et al. / arXiv · Mar 25, 2026

The source reports a test or observation

Rotor-Failure-Aware Quadrotors Flight in Unknown Environments ↗

We read the abstract and the relevant methods, results and conclusions

The quadrotor, with one propeller unloaded, undergoes two types of tests

Original wording · Where to find it: Section VI-C, autonomous indoor navigation; Fig. 11; VI-D and conclusion for boundaries

Where this applies

Author experiments; predefined waypoints, unknown obstacles; exact test date unspecified. Version is the paper configuration.

Another way to read this result

One-fault task success does not cover dual rotor loss, strong winds or independent replication.

About this source
System
Rotor-Failure-Aware research quadrotor
Version
arXiv:2510.11306v2
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Mar 25, 2026
Checked
Oct 12, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
The same experimental drone carried its navigation computation onboard.Zhou et al. / arXiv · Mar 25, 2026

The source reports a test or observation

Rotor-Failure-Aware Quadrotors Flight in Unknown Environments ↗

We read the abstract and the relevant methods, results and conclusions

is integrated into the onboard computer

Original wording · Where to find it: Section IV-A, opening sentence; VI-C physical autonomous waypoint experiment

Where this applies

Physical navigation with preset waypoints; decisions concern navigation, not an unrestricted mission.

Another way to read this result

Onboard computation does not prove an absent operator radio link or swarm coordination.

About this source
System
Rotor-Failure-Aware research quadrotor
Version
arXiv:2510.11306v2
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Mar 25, 2026
Checked
Oct 12, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
Skydio reports obstacle-avoidance failures as its most common technical incident category in Q2 2026.Skydio · Sep 22, 2026

The statement is verified; the capability is not

Skydio reliability dashboard ↗

We read the full text

Obstacle Avoidance failures remained the most common category

Original wording · Where to find it: Technical Factors, first sentence; dashboard scope and footnotes

Where this applies

Vendor aggregate across X10 releases and flight types; excludes X10D/X2D. Heading contains invalid “June 31st”; body identifies April–June, so exact event date is null.

Another way to read this result

Incident data limits reliability claims; it neither isolates each update’s effect nor disproves regular releases.

About this source
System
Skydio X10
Version
Not disclosed / unknown
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Sep 22, 2026
Checked
Oct 19, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
Qamcom reports fully automatic fire detection after launch using onboard processing.Qamcom Research and Technology · Oct 2, 2026

The statement is verified; the capability is not

Project Firefly: autonomous drones for early detection of ember fires ↗

We read the full text

everything after launch was fully automatic

Original wording · Where to find it: Development and demonstration; Fully onboard computation

Where this applies

Developer report of two drones at Vinnova’s demonstration on 28 May 2026; exact hardware/software revision undisclosed.

Another way to read this result

A first-party account of a bounded fire-detection task, without independently inspected flight logs or replication.

About this source
System
Qamcom Firefly
Version
Not disclosed / unknown
Event
May 28, 2026
Published
Oct 2, 2026
Checked
Oct 19, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
Qamcom reports a two-drone demonstration of leader–surveyor fire detection and confirmation.Qamcom Research and Technology · Oct 2, 2026

The statement is verified; the capability is not

Project Firefly: autonomous drones for early detection of ember fires ↗

We read the full text

the project demonstrated it with one

Original wording · Where to find it: System concept, leader–surveyor feedback; Development and demonstration

Where this applies

Developer report of two drones at Vinnova’s demonstration on 28 May 2026; exact hardware/software revision undisclosed.

Another way to read this result

Scaling beyond one surveyor is future work; this is not independent repetition of the ZJU swarm.

About this source
System
Qamcom Firefly
Version
Not disclosed / unknown
Event
May 28, 2026
Published
Oct 2, 2026
Checked
Oct 19, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
Qamcom says Firefly continues operating if the ground-station link drops.Qamcom Research and Technology · Oct 2, 2026

The statement is verified; the capability is not

Project Firefly: autonomous drones for early detection of ember fires ↗

We read the full text

the drones carry on if its link drops

Original wording · Where to find it: System concept, ground-station paragraph

Where this applies

Architecture statement; no dated, isolated ground-link-loss trial is described. Drone-to-drone communication is retained.

Another way to read this result

An automatic flight with no intervention does not establish that the operator link was absent during the test.

About this source
System
Qamcom Firefly
Version
Not disclosed / unknown
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Oct 2, 2026
Checked
Oct 19, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
MonoRace raced using onboard perception and control without external motion tracking.Bahnam et al. / Science Robotics · Oct 14, 2026

The source reports a test or observation

MonoRace: Robust monocular AI for champion-level drone racing ↗

We read the abstract and the relevant methods, results and conclusions

All computation is performed onboard

Original wording · Where to find it: Abstract; Introduction competition dates; Overview

Where this applies

April 2025 indoor competition; known gate map and trained race policies. Paper published in October 2026.

Another way to read this result

A bounded race does not establish general mission autonomy or an operator-link-loss test.

About this source
System
MonoRace
Version
Science Robotics aee9250 race configuration
Event
Apr 11, 2025 – Apr 12, 2025
Published
Oct 14, 2026
Checked
Oct 19, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
MonoRace recorded the fastest completion time in the reported human-versus-AI race.Bahnam et al. / Science Robotics · Oct 14, 2026

The source reports a test or observation

MonoRace: Robust monocular AI for champion-level drone racing ↗

We read the abstract and the relevant methods, results and conclusions

fastest completion time of 16.56 s

Original wording · Where to find it: Performance; competition format and Discussion

Where this applies

Organizer-timed indoor competition in April 2025; other paper timings use onboard estimates. Different tracks are not directly comparable.

Another way to read this result

No matched defensive response test or independent repetition of the same configuration; speed does not imply swarm coordination.

About this source
System
MonoRace
Version
Science Robotics aee9250 race configuration
Event
Apr 11, 2025 – Apr 12, 2025
Published
Oct 14, 2026
Checked
Oct 19, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
MonoRace lacked drone-to-drone collision avoidance and collided during the multi-drone race.Bahnam et al. / Science Robotics · Oct 14, 2026

The source reports a test or observation

MonoRace: Robust monocular AI for champion-level drone racing ↗

We read the abstract and the relevant methods, results and conclusions

does not yet detect and avoid other drones

Original wording · Where to find it: Discussion, limitations; Competition format

Where this applies

Authors’ report from the same competition; a failure in the multi-drone event, not every race.

Another way to read this result

Simultaneous racing is not coordinated swarm behavior. This limits MonoRace, not other swarm platforms.

About this source
System
MonoRace
Version
Science Robotics aee9250 race configuration
Event
Apr 11, 2025 – Apr 12, 2025
Published
Oct 14, 2026
Checked
Oct 19, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
The preprint reports physical coordination trials with two to three research drones.Kutpanova et al. / Preprints.org · Sep 29, 2026

The source reports a test or observation

A Decentralized Three-Layer Control Architecture for UAV Swarms with Onboard AI, SLAM, and Mesh Networking ↗

We read the abstract and the relevant methods, results and conclusions

field flights with 2–3 simultaneously exchanging UAVs

Original wording · Where to find it: Sections 5.2, 6.4, 7 and 8

Where this applies

Small homogeneous swarm in a controlled area; publication 29 September, test dates absent. Not peer reviewed.

Another way to read this result

Five-drone results are simulation. Scenario sample counts are incomplete, prolonged network partition remains a limit, and no independent replication was verified.

About this source
System
Three-layer F450 research swarm
Version
preprints202609.2556.v1
Event
Not disclosed / unknown
Published
Sep 29, 2026
Checked
Oct 19, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account
GA-ASI reports real-time plan adaptation in a demonstration mixing a live aircraft with simulated participants.General Atomics Aeronautical Systems · Oct 5, 2026

The statement is verified; the capability is not

GA-ASI Teams With U.S. Navy To Demonstrate Collaborative Autonomous Mission Planning for Simulated Battle ↗

We read the full text

adapt it in real time as the scenario evolved

Original wording · Where to find it: Gray Flag paragraph; following LVC paragraph

Where this applies

Vendor account of the 10 September 2026 event; TacACE version undisclosed. Physical, virtual and constructive participants are mixed.

Another way to read this result

No isolated physical response to a changed defense is documented; adaptation of a simulated plan does not meet the fixed criterion.

About this source
System
MQ-20 Avenger / TacACE
Version
Not disclosed / unknown
Event
Sep 10, 2026
Published
Oct 5, 2026
Checked
Oct 19, 2026

Related reports

No other linked publication in this review.

Reviews that used this account